Talk Bronx New York

CHANGING NYC: Bronx is changing, with artists leading way 

For decades, the Bronx had a bad reputation.

Howard Cosell intoned, “Ladies and gentleman, the Bronx is burning,” in 1977. Ten years later, Tom Wolfe picked the borough as the site of the hit-and-run accident that led to the downfall of rich, white bond trader Sherman McCoy in “The Bonfire of the Vanities.”

Over the years redevelopment has proceeded in fits and starts, with the Bronx often hailed as the next hot area.

It hasn’t quite happened yet _ the Bronx still has too many vacant lots and auto-body shops to be a yuppie paradise _ but many Bronx neighborhoods are undergoing a significant transformation.

Chains like Starbucks and the New York Sports Club are setting up shop, and underused industrial buildings are being redeveloped as shopping malls.

As in other places that have gone from gritty to trendy _ like Manhattan’s SoHo or the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn _ artists are in the vanguard.

Sculptor Linda Cunningham moved to the Bronx in 2000 and bought a five-story industrial building with two partners. She has redeveloped it into condos, part of a trend toward market-rate housing in areas where there had been nothing but government-subsidized rental units.

“I got in here because I was urgent to find a studio,” said Cunningham. “I was driven out by escalating rents everywhere.”

Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrion said more than $925 million in public and private money was invested in housing in the borough in 2007 _ up from about $237 million in 2002.

And while the nationwide economic downturn has slowed housing growth in 2008, U.S. Census figures show that the Bronx is less affected than the city as a whole.

The number of building permits filed in the city for individual apartments and for entire buildings in the first quarter of 2008 was about half of what it was in the same period last year.

In the Bronx, the figure was down just 17 percent from the prior year, from 1,037 to 862. By comparison, the number in Manhattan was down 69 percent.

And Bronx growth is not restricted to housing. The New York Yankees, who once threatened to leave for greener pastures, are instead building a new $1.3 billion stadium next to their old one, and they have pledged $800,000 a year to Bronx community groups.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced last month that the city has chosen a developer for the Kingsbridge Armory, a nine-story red-brick castle in the West Bronx that will become a mall called the Shops at the Armory.

Then there’s the fortress-like brick complex called the American Bank Note Building in the Hunt’s Point section, a landmark 1909 structure where bank notes were once printed.

Developers bought it for $32 million and plan to renovate it into offices for arts organizations, design firms and nonprofit groups, along with a retail food market.

Eight years after Cunningham and her partners bought their building in Mott Haven _ just 20 minutes by subway from midtown Manhattan _ the condo conversion has been completed and all but one of the 13 units have been sold.

Prices range from $395,000 to $795,000 _ still a bargain compared to Manhattan, where the average sale price for a co-op or condo was $1.6 million for the first quarter of 2008.

One lingering question is whether gritty Bronx neighborhoods can be fixed up without existing residents, businesses and nonprofit groups being forced out.

Of New York’s 8 million people, 1.3 million live in the Bronx. The borough’s population is largely black and Hispanic, and the poverty rate remains high.

According to Census figures, 28.9 of Bronx households were below the poverty line in 2005. The median household income was $29,331.

“We are experiencing a certain amount of gentrification,” said Carol Zakaluk, a lifelong Bronx resident who is a grant writer for a gallery. But Zakaluk said there are 11 housing projects in the area where she lives “and they’re not going anywhere.”

She envisions a future where people of all classes live side by side. “It’s got to be a little bit of each,” she said. “That’s my hope anyway.”

Whether that can happen remains to be seen.

The developers of the American Bank Note Building, henceforth to be called the BankNote, have said they expect the renovated project to rent for at least $20 per square foot. In Manhattan the average is $65 per square foot.

“We believe that if we create the right product and bring the right people there, it will help transform the area,” said Charles Bendit, co-chief executive of Taconic Investment Partners, which is developing the property with Denham Wolf Real Estate Services.

But the building’s current tenants will see their rents double, and some have left. A homeless drop-in center called the Living Room will soon be homeless itself.

“They’re saying they want us to leave in August,” said Carolyn McLaughlin, whose organization runs the Living Room.

A choreographer who goes by the single name Pepper is also shopping for a new home.

Pepper said her $450 monthly rent at the BankNote was slated to go up to $2,000 within 18 months. She is using temporary office space elsewhere and has put her costumes in storage.

Pepper is not happy about being displaced after she helped to build the Bronx arts scene that the BankNote developers are investing in.

“Who created that buzz?” she said. “The artists did it, not the landlords.”

SOURCE: NewsDay.com

(No Ratings Yet)
 Loading ...
 Email This Post

Restaurants Must Post Calories, Judge Affirms

Calorie counts must be posted alongside prices in some New York City restaurants, a federal judge ruled on Wednesday in upholding revised city regulations.

The restaurant association that lost on Wednesday said it would ask the judge to stay the ruling pending an appeal.

The decision, by Judge Richard J. Holwell of United States District Court in Manhattan, rejected First Amendment claims by the New York State Restaurant Association, which maintained that the mandatory labeling requirements were impermissible.

Under the rules, which the city’s health department revised after Judge Holwell struck down an earlier version last fall, any chain with at least 15 outlets nationwide would have to display calorie counts on menu boards, menus or food tags. The rules would apply to roughly 2,000 restaurants, or about 10 percent of the 23,000 in the city, the health department said.

In a 27-page opinion, Judge Holwell accepted one of the city’s main arguments for posting calorie counts — that doing so would help reduce obesity, which city officials say has reached epidemic levels.

“It seems reasonable to expect that some consumers will use the information” on menu boards and menus “to select lower-calorie meals,” the judge wrote. He added that “these choices will lead to a lower incidence of obesity.”

Some chain-restaurant outlets, among them Starbucks, have already posted calorie counts. The rules were scheduled go into effect on Monday. But the restaurant association said it was filing an appeal and would appear before Judge Holwell on Thursday to ask for a delay until after the appeal.

Chuck Hunt, a spokesman for the association, said it was disappointed in the ruling. He also said that it would cause “irreparable harm” to have to comply with the rules next week if they ended up being invalidated.

“We continue to say that each restaurant should make decisions about the best way to provide this nutritional information to their customers,” Mr. Hunt said. “Most of these restaurants that are being affected were already providing this information, but in a different format.”

But the city’s health commissioner, Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, called Judge Holwell’s decision “a victory for New Yorkers.”

“It will give people information they need, where they need it,” he said. “If you want to use it, great, and if you don’t, that’s entirely your right.”

The restaurant association maintained that the calorie rules violate the First Amendment because they force restaurants to convey a government message — “a message,” the judge noted in his decision, “with which they may disagree.”

The judge said the calorie counts required by the new rules are “reasonably related to the government’s interest in providing consumers with accurate nutritional information.” For that reason, he said, the rules do not infringe on restaurants’ First Amendment rights.

“The judge’s decision is crystal clear,” Dr. Frieden said. “They can go to court and delay us for a few more months, but if they do that, it just means McDonald’s and Kentucky Fried Chicken are desperate to keep this information out the hands of their customers.”

SOURCE: NYTimes.com Read more..

(No Ratings Yet)
 Loading ...
 Email This Post